The global Sleep Apnea Devices market is expected to develop USD 7,716.59 million by 2029, at a compound annual increase in price (CAGR) of 7.6% throughout the forecast period.
Factors driving the growth of the sleep apnea devices market include growing cognizance about the unpleasant effects of untreated sleep apnea, high-tech developments in sleep apnea devices and increasing number of establishments attempting into the sleep apnea and oral appliances markets.
Sleep apnea happens in around 25% of men and 10% of women. Sleep apnea can distress individuals of all ages, comprising babies and children but is mostly seen in persons above the age of 40 and individuals who are overweight. Folks with untreated sleep apnea discontinue breathing frequently in the course of their sleep, occasionally hundreds of times through the night.
Regionally, North America accounted for the largest market share of the global sleep apnea devices market attributable to considerable venture capital funding. Leading players of the global sleep apnea devices market include Curative Medical Inc., Somnomed, Philips Respironics, Oventus Medical, ResMed, Löwenstein Medical Drive, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Compumedics, Cadwell Laboratories, Invacare Corporation, Devilbiss Healthcare among others.
Sleep Apnea Devices Market Scope
Metrics | Details |
Base Year | 2023 |
Historic Data | 2018-2022 |
Forecast Period | 2024-2029 |
Study Period | 2018-2029 |
Forecast Unit | Value (USD) |
Revenue forecast in 2029 | USD 7,716.59 million |
Growth Rate | CAGR of 7.6 % during 2019-2029 |
Segment Covered | Diseases type, Type, End User, Distribution Channel, Regions |
Regions Covered | North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa |
Key Players Profiled | Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Netherlands), Itamar Medical Ltd. (Israel), Natus Medical Incorporated (US), CONTEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD (China), ResMed (US), BMC Medical Co., Ltd. (China), SomnoMed (Australia), Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited (New Zealand) |
Key segments of the global sleep apnea devices market
Type Overview (USD Million)
- Therapeutic devices
- Diagnostic devices
End-use Overview, (USD Million)
- Sleep laboratories and hospitals
- Home care settings
Regional Overview, (USD Million)
- North America
- U.S.
- Canada
- Europe
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Asia Pacific
- China
- Japan
- India
- South America
- Middle East & Africa
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) :
Oral appliances (OAs) are devices that can be used in the treatment of sleep disorders, more specifically, sleep apnea. One of the main hurdles to development in the OA market is billing. It is essential that sleep dentists and medical doctor work collectively for the referral process, so that dentists participate in medical billing. The intricacy involved in medical billing where they have conventionally stayed aloof due the complication of insurance coding and settlements has retained many dentists away from these produces in the previous years. The bulk of OAs are remunerated by private coverage or out of pocket as Medicare has been inadequate in its readiness to consent them as a sleep apnea treatment.
The global sleep apnea devices market is categorized based on type and end-use.
By type: The therapeutic devices segment is expected to show promising growth by 2028 due to the growth in usage of oral appliances and its associated reimbursement.
By end-use: The sleep laboratories and hospitals accounted for the largest share of the global sleep apnea devices market in 2020 owing to growth in the number of sleep labs and sleep tests performed.
In the US, nearly 93% of the sleep apnea population uses only positive airway pressure (PAP). In contrast, parts of Europe use OAs more frequently as a primary treatment and they have become a standard of care. Some may attribute this to Europe’s socialized healthcare, which recognizes the cost benefits of OA treatments. With the ability to price cap payments to dentists, OAs are generally half the price, without out-of-pocket expenses. This makes it a less-expensive treatment for payers than traditional PAP. Others could fault insurance and PAP companies who have been slow to recognize alternative treatments to PAP. However, a few companies in the US are looking forward with mergers and acquisitions.